top of page

ADVANCE THE DEAL WHILE HAVING AN EFFECTIVE WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH LAWYERS



As M&A professionals (on the business side), we work very closely with our legal counterparts to get deals done. The relationship is symbiotic. Here are my top three takeaways to advance the deal while having an effective working relationship between the two functions.


๐Ÿญ) ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— &๐—” ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜

The temptation (as a deal lead) is sometimes to move fast and get commercial terms in place before really getting legal involved. But Iโ€™ve found that on deals where Iโ€™ve slowed down to loop in the legal team early about the business goals and strategic deal objectives, we inevitably move faster down the line โ€“ and avoid risks that could blow up later on.


๐Ÿฎ) ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต-๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น, ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ณ ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น

In the early stages of the deal, the corp dev / business side is doing more of the heavy lifting. As the deal shifts into drafting and legal negotiations, the lawyers are. Regardless, have at least a weekly touchpoint (and increase the frequency as the deal heats up), to update each other of the timeline, status, risks and concerns. In multiple situations, Iโ€™ve found that my legal counterpart has offered up elegant structuring solutions on issues that I had assumed needed to be resolved through entirely commercial terms.


๐Ÿฏ) ๐—œ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€

Sometimes, I find the M&A / corporate development team burning cycles trying to unravel multiple clauses and definitions in legal drafts. And Iโ€™ve also found the legal team spinning when the commercial terms are unclear. Hereโ€™s a (simplified) approach that Iโ€™ve found works effectively. The M&A deal leadโ€™s role should fully include establishing โ€œwhat structure do we want the legal documents to lay outโ€ and โ€œwhere do we want to end up from a business perspectiveโ€. The legal teamโ€™s role should fully include structuring the language and agreements to get the deal there. And both jointly work together to negotiate the best possible structure and terms, and anticipate and plan for potential issues.

bottom of page